review-mcp
A remote MCP server that provides adversarial multi-model code review for AI coding agents. It routes code through a panel of different models plus deterministic detectors to return a structured pass/fail verdict with typed issues and suggested fixes.
Endpoint and access
No sign-in to connect and list tools. Individual tools may still need a vendor account, credentials, or permissions; check the documented prerequisites.
https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcpWhat its tools do
1 tool, grouped by the hints the server advertises. Hints are self-declared, not verified behavior.
Not annotated (1)
Checks and signals
Each line is separate evidence, not a trust score.
- Passed Endpoint answered the live check ·
- Availability 1 of 1 checks passed in 30 days
What you can do with it
- Review code before shipping or merging a change
- Get a second opinion on a risky diff
- Act as a quality gate inside an autonomous build loop
- Review code when a single-model agent would miss its own blind spots
Source and maintenance
Protocol and capabilities
- Server
- review-mcp 0.1.0
- MCP protocol negotiated in check
- 2025-11-25
- Tools
- 1 advertised
- Resources
- Not advertised
- Resource templates
- Not advertised
- Prompts
- Not advertised
{
"tools": {
"listChanged": true
}
}Tools
1 advertised
review_code
Adversarial multi-model code review. Submit a diff, a module, or a spec+implementation and get back a structured pass/fail verdict with each issue's type, severity, location, explanation, and suggested fix. Why call this instead of reviewing your own output: a single model shares its blind spots with itself. This routes your code through a panel of *different* models plus a set of deterministic detectors, catching what self-review misses — path/contract violations, module incoherence (dangling imports, broken cross-references), syntax and call-arity regressions in a diff's post-image, and 'prose instead of tool calls' (output that describes an action rather than emitting it). The panel adds semantic judgment on top and never overrides a deterministic finding. Call it before shipping or merging, as a second opinion on a risky change, or as a gate in an autonomous build loop. Choose depth='fast' (one model, low latency) or 'deep' (full panel, higher recall). Deep review audits files of any size in milestone chunks so every panel model contributes; the price (shown in the 402) and the payment window scale with file size. Per-call limit ~1,600 lines — larger inputs return 413, so split by file/module and call once per file. Paid per call via x402 (USDC on Base); the price is announced in the 402 response before any charge.
{
"type": "object",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"required": [
"payload",
"language"
],
"properties": {
"depth": {
"enum": [
"fast",
"deep"
],
"type": "string",
"description": "\"fast\" = single-model, low latency; \"deep\" = full panel, higher recall (default \"deep\")."
},
"context": {
"type": "string",
"description": "optional spec/intent, related interfaces, constraints, or what the change should do."
},
"payload": {
"type": "string",
"description": "a unified diff, a complete module/file, or a spec plus its implementation (include enough context lines for diffs)."
},
"language": {
"type": "string",
"description": "primary language of the payload (e.g. \"typescript\", \"python\")."
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}Prompts
Not advertised
Resources
Not advertised
90-day uptime
A lightweight connection check about every six hours, sampled on hosts with many listings. It shows the server answered, not that its tools work.
- 2026-11-06: 1 of 1 checks answered
- 2026-11-07: 1 of 1 checks answered
30-day availability
Aggregated from read-only remote checks; this is not a tool-execution or security guarantee.
- Successful checks
- 1 of 1 (100%)
- Average latency
- 889 ms
- 95th percentile latency
- 889 ms
Maintenance history
Public check and source-refresh events. Editorial and ownership records remain private.
- · probe · passed · 889 ms · metadata changed · 1 tool(s)
Connect from your client
Each snippet registers the same endpoint; pick the client you use.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http review-mcp https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcpCodex
codex mcp add review-mcp --url https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcpCursor
{
"mcpServers": {
"review-mcp": {
"url": "https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
}
}
}Cline
{
"mcpServers": {
"review-mcp": {
"type": "streamableHttp",
"url": "https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp",
"disabled": false
}
}
}VS Code
{
"servers": {
"review-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
}
}
}Gemini CLI
gemini mcp add --transport http review-mcp https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcpClaude Desktop
https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcpWindsurf
{
"mcpServers": {
"review-mcp": {
"serverUrl": "https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
}
}
}Let your agent find its tools
Find servers like review-mcp from your agent. Add Koskamo once to search the index for endpoints, access requirements, and client setup. Public discovery needs no key.